![]() Just 5 days before this, millions of gallons of chemicals and water spewed into Towanda Creek and then into the Susquehanna after an accident at a gas well. This water comes from the Susquehanna a few miles upstream of Danville. We need to listen to the Grand Jury’s recommendations and implement them to make sure we protect every Pennsylvanian's right to clean air and pure water.A few weeks ago I watched my 2 sons leave their Sunday Class and run down the hall to get a drink from the water fountain. Shapiro responded with a Tweet of his own: “Thank you for putting a spotlight on this issue. Fracking companies have devastated PA & poisoned residents & PA Department of Environmental Protection was complicit.” Naturally, Mr. On the other hand, the AG did win the approval of actor/activist Mark Ruffalo, who r esponded to the report on Twitter, saying “ is right. Instead, he has invested two years at great cost to the taxpayer to do what, exactly? Produce a report that attempts to re-litigate cases from a decade ago and which doesn’t even get the current law right. As the Attorney General, he has an obligation to know and enforce all of the laws and regulations of the state. In traveling down this demagogic road, AG Shapiro does a disservice not just to the industry and its regulators, but also the citizens of his state. ![]() Obviously, the AG must fully understand that reality. The negative economic consequences that would result from that outcome would be harsh and would immediately impact every Pennsylvanian. As anyone with the most rudimentary understanding of the process and the state of Pennsylvania would understand, if you can’t drill a well within half a mile of any house, church, school, business office, convenience store or any other occupied dwelling, as well as any river, creek, lake or pond, then you have effectively banned drilling - and thus, fracking - in the state of Pennsylvania. Moving from the ridiculous to the sublime, Shapiro contends that he doesn’t want to “ban” fracking in their state, yet his report recommends an onerous 2,500-foot setback rule copied from the infamous Colorado Proposition 112, which was resoundingly rejected by the voters of that state in the 2018 elections. How can anyone in a position of authority stand in such harsh judgment of any business or industry without having engaged in any first-hand observations of its operations? If accurate, that is a glaring omission of duty on Shapiro’s part. Interestingly, there is no evidence that any member of the grand jury – or the Attorney General – has ever visited an active drilling or production site, pipeline construction site, compressor or processing facility.” Spigelmyer also alleges that the report includes a number of anecdotal allegations without providing any factual basis to support them, adding that “The report fails to identify any specific instance that substantiates its claims of impacts, which conveniently means they cannot be directly refuted. It is now required in every shale-producing state. Shapiro also falsely alleges that companies who perform frac jobs are not required to disclose the chemicals used in the fracturing fluids, a controversy that the industry began addressing voluntarily on a national basis way back in 2010, was mandated by Texas and Colorado in 2011, and became mandated under Pennsylvania law by Act 13 in 2012. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |